Suche auf www.groupfleet-news.com

Hinweis

Externer Link: Wenn Sie auf diesen Link gehen, verlassen Sie die Seiten der Volkswagen AG. Die Volkswagen AG macht sich die durch Links erreichbaren Seiten Dritter nicht zu eigen und ist für deren Inhalte nicht verantwortlich. Es gelten dann gegebenenfalls etwaige Nutzungsbedingungen des Dritten. Volkswagen hat keinen Einfluss darauf, welche Daten auf dieser Seite von Ihnen erhoben, gespeichert oder verarbeitet werden. Nähere Informationen hierzu können Sie gegebenenfalls in der Datenschutzerklärung des Anbieters der externen Webseite finden.

Abbrechen

Fleet Knowledge  |  Music while driving

The Sound of Science

16. Dezember 2025

For many people, music is as much a part of driving as the ignition key. Get in, play your favourite song, shut out the world. But research is dispelling the myth of the harmless playlist. What we listen to in the car has a measurable influence on our driving behaviour – with consequences for safety.

Around 70 per cent of all car drivers regularly listen to music in their vehicles. It affects our mood, provides privacy in public spaces and turns even the morning commute into a little escape from everyday life. But behind this obvious fact lies an effect that science is now measuring precisely. Several meta-studies show that music influences driving performance – from reaction time and lane keeping to speed.¹⁾²⁾ The crucial question, however, is how exactly it does this!

In the wake of your favourite song

 

Whether classical, rock or electro: It doesn’t depend on the genre, but rather on the so-called arousal, i.e. the inner stimulation that the music evokes.³⁾ Simple fact: Too little stimulation makes you tired, too much stimulation makes you hectic. Both demand attention – and in traffic this naturally belongs entirely on the road.¹⁾⁵⁾

This is exactly where the myth of the positive influence of your favourite song starts to fall apart. Emotionally meaningful music captures our attention more strongly than many people realise. It triggers feelings that have nothing to do with the traffic situation, but have a direct impact on driving behaviour. Studies document longer reaction times, more erratic steering and higher speeds – especially among young people at the wheel.¹⁾²⁾⁵⁾ Back in 2013, Warren Brodsky demonstrated at Ben Gurion University that novice drivers, in particular, make more mistakes when listening to their favourite music – they drive more carelessly and aggressively. Stimulating music increases impulsive behaviour significantly more in them than in older people.⁵⁾

A relaxed pace is a good tactic

 

What is particularly interesting is that the beat often determines the speed. An analysis with AI models shows that faster speeds correlate with riskier driving behaviour. This results in more frequent lane changes, abrupt acceleration manoeuvres and increased speeds.⁸⁾ Conversely, quiet music can increase driving stability. Music is therefore far from being a passive companion – it acts like an additional control loop in the mind. Brodsky later summed it up dramatically in an interview: “The car is the only place in the world you can die just because you’re listening to the wrong kind of music.” The statement dates back to 2015 – the data behind it remains current. A meta-analysis from 2019 summarises the literature as follows: “Music-listening has a statistically significant detrimental effect on driving performance.”¹⁾ The old advice of the Hanover-based music psychologist Reinhard Kopiez to turn down the radio in “demanding driving situations” is more relevant than ever.

Don’t play with the display

 

Despite the influence of the choice of music, it is primarily the “route” to it that affects the risk when driving. Modern cockpits demand attention because touchscreens engage both the eyes and hands.⁷⁾ Many literally lose sight of the road. Simulator studies show prolonged reactions in areas that are otherwise more commonly associated with blood alcohol levels.⁶⁾ The European Road Safety Council sums it up: “If you control the music for just 2 seconds while driving at 63 km/h, you have driven more than 30 metres blind.”⁹⁾

Wrapped – Music at the wheel

 

In the end, a paradoxical picture emerges: Music can reduce fatigue and prevent driving errors when played at a moderate volume.⁴⁾ However, it can also trigger those impulses that are usually attributed to “tailgaters” in the left-hand lane. The playlist is therefore no longer a lifestyle accessory, but an underestimated lever in the safety concept of modern mobility.

Good to know

Too loud = too dangerous
The so-called masking effect begins above 80 dB: Loud music masks outside noises such as sirens, horns or screeching tyres. Above 85 dB there is even a risk of hearing damage.

 

Too fast = too risky
Songs with over 120 beats per minute (BPM) lead to faster driving – on average 5 – 10 km/h above the limit. The recommended BPM range is between 60 and 80. This corresponds to the resting frequency of the heart.

 

Too emotional = too distracting
Favourite songs trigger feelings that have nothing to do with the driving situation; they use up mental resources. Texts, memories and strong moods distract from the traffic. Young people are particularly affected, as studies show that they tend to make more mistakes, steer more erratically and drive faster.

 

Too complex = too cognitively demanding
Jazz, blues or improvised music with changing rhythms challenge the brain more. This increases the cognitive load – i.e. the amount of thought processes in parallel with driving. According to studies, pop music is considered safer: simple rhythms, predictable structures, few distractions.

FAQ

Yes – studies show effects on reaction, speed and lane keeping.

Quelle: Millet et al. (2019)

Yes – it increases the error rate and willingness to take risks, especially in young people.

Quelle: Kasprzak (2022)

Yes. Certain styles of music can have a stimulating effect and reduce signs of fatigue.

Quelle: Orsini et al. (2024)

Calm songs with few lyrics (60 – 80 beats per minute), e.g. instrumental pop.

Quelle: Ghojazadeh (2023), Shajari (2025)

Quellen:
(1) Millet, B., Ahn, S., Chattah, J. (2019). The impact of music on vehicular performance: A meta‑analysis. Transportation Research.
(2) Ghojazadeh, M. et al. (2023). Effect of music on driving performance and physiological and psychological indicators: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. Health Promotion Perspectives. 
(3) Ünal, A. B., de Waard, D., Epstude, K., Steg, L. (2013). Driving with music: Effects on arousal and performance. Transportation Research.
(4) Orsini, F. et al. (2024). Music as a countermeasure to fatigue: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research. 
(5) Karageorghis, C. I. et al. (2022). Influence of music on driver psychology and safety‑relevant behaviours: a multi‑study inductive content analysis. Transportation Research. 
(6) TRL / IAM RoadSmart (2020). Effect of infotainment systems on driver performance. Project Report.
(7) European Commission (2024). ERSO Thematic Report – Driver Distraction.
(8) Shajari, A. et al. (2025). Evaluating the impact of music tempo on drivers and their performance using an artificial intelligence model: a multi-source data approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 37, 9401–9412.
(9) European Transport Safety Council, Nov 12, 2024, New warning on infotainment screen distraction.

Stand: 16.12.2025

© Volkswagen AG

Touareg R FINAL EDITION, power consumption weighted, combined: 15.2-14.8 kWh/100 km plus 6.0-5.2 l/100 km; combined fuel consumption (battery discharged): 10.1-9.4 l/100 km; CO₂ emissions weighted, combined: 136-119 g/km; CO₂ class weighted, combined: E-D; CO₂ class (battery discharged): G. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 12.2025)
Combined pure electric range, for 19- to 21-inch wheels. (Status: 10.2025)
Combined pure electric range, for 18- to 21-inch wheels. (Status: 10.2025)
Combined pure electric range, for 18- to 20-inch wheels. (Status: 10.2025)
Combined pure electric range, for 17- to 18-inch wheels. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi Q8 SUV TFSI e, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 1.4–1.2 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 29.1–27.8 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 33–28 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 10.5–9.8 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: G. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi Q7 SUV TFSI e, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 1.4–1.2 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 29.1–27.8 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 33–28 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 10.5–9.8 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: G. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi Q5 Sportback e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 3.4–2.5 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 16.9–15.5 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 77–56 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 8.4–7.2 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: G–F. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi Q5 SUV e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 3.4–2.5 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 16.9–15.5 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 77–56 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 8.4–7.2 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: G–F. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi Q3 Sportback e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.2–1.7 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 15.1–14.0 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 50–40 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 6.7–6.0 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: E. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi Q3 SUV e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.1–1.7 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 14.9–13.9 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 49–39 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 6.6–6.0 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: E. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A8 L TFSI e, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.2–1.8 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 23.9–22.0 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 49–40 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 9.5–8.8 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: G. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A8 TFSI e, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.1–1.7 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 23.6–21.9 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 48–39 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 9.4–8.7 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: G. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A6 Avant e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.9–2.2 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 16.3–15.2 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 66–51 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 7.7–6.7 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: F–E. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A6 Limousine e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.8–2.1 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 16.1–15.0 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 63–48 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 7.5–6.5 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: F–E. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A5 Avant e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.7–2.1 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 15.9–15.0 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 61–47 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 7.4–6.5 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: F–E. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A5 Limousine e-hybrid, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 2.6–2.0 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 15.7–19.9 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 60–45 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 7.3–6.3 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: F–E. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A3 allstreet TFSI e, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 0.4–0.3 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 16.6–15.0 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 8–7 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 5.3–4.9 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: D–C. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Audi A3 Sportback TFSI e, fuel consumption (weighted combined): 0.4–0.3 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted combined): 16.6–14.6 kWh/100km; CO₂ emissions (weighted combined): 8–6 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted combined): B; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined:(combined): 5.4–4.9 l/100 km; CO₂ class battery discharged: D–C. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
T-Roc Style, fuel consumption (combined): 6.0–5.6 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 137–128 g/km; CO₂ class: E-D. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
T-Roc R-Line, fuel consumption (combined): 6.0–5.6 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 136–128 g/km; CO₂ class: E-D. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Porsche 911 Turbo S, fuel consumption (combined): 11.8–11.6 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 266–262 g/km; CO₂ class: G. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 10.2025)
Image shows a near-production concept car,, no consumption and emission data are available actually.
CUPRA Terramar VZ 1.5 e-HYBRID 200 kW (272 PS), fuel consumption (weighted, combined): 0.5–0.4 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted, combined): 19.0–17.6 kWh/100 km; fuel consumption (battery discharged): 6.1–5.7 l/100 km; CO₂ emissions (weighted, combined): 12–10 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted, combined): B; CO₂ class (battery discharged): E–D. (Status: 09.2025)
Škoda Octavia Combi RS, fuel consumption (combined): 7.8–6.8 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 163–154 g/km; CO₂ class: F–E. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
Audi A6 Avant, fuel consumption (combined): 8.0–5.0 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 181–130 g/km; CO₂ class: G–D. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
Audi RS3 Sportback, fuel consumption (combined): 6.7–7.1 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 153–161 g/km; CO₂ class: E–F. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
Škoda Octavia RS, fuel consumption (combined): 6.7–7.1 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 161–153 g/km; CO₂ class: F–E. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
Škoda Elroq 85, power consumption (combined): 16.4–15.2 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
CUPRA Tavascan VZ 4Drive 250 kW (340 PS) 77 kWh, power consumption (combined): 17.1–18.5 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, power consumption (combined): 18.9–15.6 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
ID. Buzz GTX 4Motion long wheelbase, power consumption (combined): 21.3–20.2 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. Consumption and CO₂ emission figures may vary depending on the selected equipment of the vehicle. The vehicle illustration shows special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
ID.7 GTX Tourer, power consumption (combined): 18.8–16.6 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emission (combined): combined 0 g/km. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicle. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2025)
Audi Q3 SUV, fuel consumption in l/100 km (combined): 9.0–5.3; CO₂ emissions in g/km (combined): 205–137; CO₂ class: G. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status 07.2025)
Škoda Enyaq 85x (210 kW/286 PS), power consumption, combined: 15.8–16.8 kWh/100 km; CO₂ consumption, combined: 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. (Status: 04.2025)
Golf GTE, power consumption weighted, combined: 16.2–15.9 kWh/100 km plus 0.4 l/100 km; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 5.4–5.3 l/100 km; CO₂ fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 8 g/km; CO₂ class weighted, combined: B; CO₂ class battery discharged: D. (Status: 04.2025)
Passat Business eHybrid (130/85 kW), power consumption weighted, combined: 16.1 kWh/100 km plus 0.4 l/100 km; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 5.4 l/100 km; CO₂ fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 9 g/km; CO₂ class weighted, combined: B; CO₂ class battery discharged: D. (Status: 04.2025)
Touareg R eHybrid, power consumption weighted, combined: 25.6–24.6 kWh/100 km plus 2.5–2.2 l/100 km; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 9.7–9.2 l/100 km; CO₂ fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 56–50 g/km; CO₂ class weighted, combined: B; CO₂ class battery discharged: G. (Status: 04.2025)
Audi A6 Avant e-tron, electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 17.5–14.4; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0; CO₂ class: A. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2025)
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron, electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.5–13.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0; CO₂ class: A. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2025)
CUPRA Terramar VZ 1.5 e-HYBRID 200 kW (272 PS), fuel consumption (weighted, combined): 0.4-0.5 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted, combined): 17.6-19.0 kWh/100 km; fuel consumption (battery discharged): 5.7-6.1 l/100 km; CO₂ emissions (weighted, combined): 10-12 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted, combined): B; CO₂ class (battery discharged): D-E. (Status: 12.2024)
Škoda Elroq, power consumption, combined: 15.2–16.6 kWh/100 km; CO₂ consumption battery, combined: 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. (Status: 12.2024)
Audi S6 Sportback e-tron, electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.7–15.7; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0; CO₂ class: A. Information on electricity consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance, electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: combined: 17.0–14.8; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0; CO₂ class: A. Information on electricity consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance, electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 15.9–14.0; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0; CO₂ class: A. Information on electricity consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
CUPRA Formentor VZ 2.0 4Drive 245 kW (333 PS), fuel consumption (combined): 8.7-8.9 l/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 192-201 g/km; CO₂ class (combined): G. Information on consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
CUPRA Leon VZ 1.5 e-HYBRID 200 kW (272 PS), fuel consumption (weighted, combined) 0,4 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted, combined) 16.5-16.8 kWh/100 km; fuel consumption (battery discharged) 5.4-5.5 l/100 km; CO₂ class (weighted, combined) 9-10 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted, combined): B; CO₂ class (battery discharged): D. Information on consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
CUPRA Leon Sportstourer VZ 1.5 e-HYBRID 200 kW (272 PS), fuel consumption (weighted, combined) 0.4-0.5 l/100 km; power consumption (weighted, combined) 16.7-17.1 kWh/100 km; fuel consumption (battery discharged) 5,5-5,6 l/100 km; CO₂ class (weighted, combined) 9-11 g/km; CO₂ class (weighted, combined): B; CO₂ class (battery discharged): D. Information on consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
CUPRA Tavascan Z 4Drive 250 kW (340 PS) 77 kWh, power consumption (combined): 16.5-18.1 kWh/100 km; CO₂ emissions (combined): 0 g/km; CO₂ class: A. Information on consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2024)
Golf Style eHybrid, power consumption weighted, combined: 15.7–14.7 kWh/100 km plus 0.4–0.3 l/100 km; fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 5.3–5.0 l/100 km; CO₂ fuel consumption battery discharged, combined: 9–6 g/km; CO₂ class weighted, combined: B; CO₂ class battery discharged: D–C. (Status: 04.2025)
Q6 e-tron, electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 19.6-16.5; CO₂ emission in g/km: combined 0; CO₂ class: A. Information on electricity consumption, CO₂ emissions and CO₂ classes given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 06.2024)
Q7, fuel consumption in l/100 km (combined):11,0–7,8; CO₂ emissions in g/km (combined): 251–204; CO₂ class: G. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status 03.2024)
ID.7 Tourer Pro, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.8-14.5; CO₂ emission in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicle. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2024)
Superb, the official consumption and emission figures will not be available until the type approval process is concluded. (Status: 12.2023)
Enyaq 85 / Enyaq 85x, Enyaq 85: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 15.8-14.9; CO₂ emission in g/km: combined 0. Enyaq 85x: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.8-16.0; CO₂ emission in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle image shows special equipment. (Status: 12.2023)
Q4 Sportback e-tron, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 18,9–15,6 (WLTP); CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle image shows special equipment. (Status: 11.2023)
Audi S6 Limousine TDI, fuel consumption in l/100 km (combined): 7,3–6,9; CO₂ emissions in g/km (combined): 191–182. Consumption and emission values are only available according to WLTP and not according to NEDC for the vehicle. (Status: 10.2023)
Audi S6 Avant TDI, fuel consumption in l/100 km (combined): 7.5–7.1; CO₂ emissions in g/km (combined): 196–187. Consumption and emission values are only available according to WLTP and not according to NEDC for the vehicle. (Status: 10.2023)
Audi S7 Sportback TDI, fuel consumption in l/100 km (combined): 7.5–7.1; CO₂ emissions in g/km (combined): 195–186. Consumption and emission values are only available according to WLTP and not according to NEDC for the vehicle. (Status: 10.2023)
Porsche Taycan 4, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 24.8–19.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status:07.2023)
Audi e-tron GT quattro, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 21.6–19.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status:07.2023)
Born 170 kW (231 PS) 77 kWh, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 17.5-15.7; CO₂ emissions in g/km: kombiniert 0; electric range (combined): 496-552 km (527-551 km for 5 seater) (WLTP). Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status:07.2023)
Tavascan, vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 04.2023)
Vehicle no longer available for order, no consumption and emission data are available.
Golf Alltrack, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 5.9–5.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 154-146. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
Audi R8 Spyder, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 13.9–13.4; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 316-305. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
Polo GTI, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 7.1–6.8; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 161-153. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
Leon CUPRA 300, no longer available for order. (Status: 03.2023)
Audi e-tron, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 24.3–22.0; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0: efficiency class: A+++. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2019)
A6 Avant TFSI e quattro, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 1.6–1.3; power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 21.5–19.8; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 37-30. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
SEAT Leon e-Hybrid, currently not available. (Status: 03.2023)
Arteon eHybrid and Arteon Shhoting Brake eHybrid, Arteon eHybrid: fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 1.4–1.1; power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.0–14.7; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 31-25. Arteon Shooting Brake eHybrid: fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 1.4–1.2; power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.2–15.0; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 32-26. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicles. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
T-Roc R, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 9.1–8.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 205-196. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status:03.2023)
ID.4, ID.4 Pure Performance: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 17.9–16.7; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. ID.4 Pro Performance: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 18.6–16.4; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. ID.4 Pro 4MOTION: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 19.3–17.1; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0.Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
Enyaq iV and Enyaq Coupé iV, Enyaq iV: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 17.1–15.8; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Enyaq Coupé iV: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.9–15.4; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0.Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
Motorsports vehicle, not available as a production model, no consumption and emission data are available.
ID.4 GTX, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 19.3–17.2 (WLTP); CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 03.2023)
Amarok PanAmericana, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 10.5–10.2; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 274-267. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status:03.2023)
ID.3, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.5–15.2; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 07.2023)
Audi Q8 e-tron, combined power consumption in kWh/100 km: 24.4–20.1(WLTP); CO₂ emissions (combined) in g/km: 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not according to NEDC are available for the vehicles. Information on fuel/power consumption and CO₂ emissions given in ranges depends on the equipment selected for the vehicle. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 12.2022)
Superb, official consumption and emission figures are not yet available, as the type approval process has not yet been completed.
ID. Buzz and ID. Buzz Cargo, ID. Buzz Pro: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 21.8 - 20.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. ID. Buzz Cargo: power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 22.3-20.3; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not NEDC are available for the vehicles. Fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions data with ranges depending on the vehicle equipment selected. Vehicle illustrations show optional equipment.
ID.5 Pro and ID.5 Pro Performance, Power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 18.4-16.1; CO2 emissions in g/km: combined 0. Only consumption and emission values according to WLTP and not NEDC are available for the vehicles. Fuel consumption and CO2 emission data with ranges depending on the equipment selected for the vehicles. Vehicle illustration shows optional equipment.
Image shows concept vehicle/study, the vehicle is not available as a production model, no consumption and emission data are available.
ID.5 Pro, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.2; CO2 emissions in g/km: 0; efficiency class: A+++.Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 11.2021)
ID.5 GTX, Power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 17.1; CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0; efficiency class: A+++. Vehicle image shows special equipment. (Status: 05.2022)
Audi e-tron, power consumption in kWh/100 km: 24.3–22.0 combined; CO2-emission combined in g/km: 0; Efficiency class: A+++. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 09.2019)
ID.4 Pro Performance, power consumption in kWh/100 km: 16.0–14.8 combined; CO2-emission combined in g/km: 0; Efficiency class: A+++. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 02.2021)
Q5 Sportback, fuel consumption in l/100 km: Combined 7.6-4.7; CO2 emissions in g/km: Combined 182-123; efficiency class: C-A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 02.2021)
Caddy Cargo, Fuel consumption in l/100 km: Combined 5.8-4.4; CO₂ emissions in g/km: Combined 131-117. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 02.2021)
OCTAVIA COMBI SCOUT 1,5 TSI DSG e-TEC 110 kW, fuel consumption in l/100 km: Urban 6.1, extra-urban 4.2, combined 4.9; CO2 emissions in g/km: combined 112; efficiency class: A. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 02.2021)
SEAT Leon Sportstourer e-HYBRID, power consumption in kWh/100 km: Combined: 15.5–15.0; electricity consumption/petrol in l/100 km: Combined 1.3–1.2; CO2 emissions in g/km: Combined 29–27; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 02.2021)
SEAT Leon e-HYBRID, power consumption in kWh/100 km: Combined 15.4–14.9; fuel consumption/petrol in l/100 km: Combined 1.3–1.2; CO2 emissions in g/km: Combined 29–27; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2021)
SEAT Tarraco e-HYBRID, power consumption in kWh/100 km: Combined 14.5; fuel consumption/petrol in l/100 km: Combined 1.8; CO2 emissions in g/km: Combined 41; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2021)
Audi Q4 e-tron , power consumption in kWh/100 km: Combined 17.3–15.8 (NEDC); Combined 19.0–17.0 (WLTP); CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0; efficiency class A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2021)
Octavia RS iV, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 1.5; power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 11.2; CO2 emissions in g/km: combined 33; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment.
Octavia Combi RS iV, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 1.5; power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 11.4; CO2 emissions in g/km: combined 34; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2021)
OCTAVIA COMBI iV, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 1.4; power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 11.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 31; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2021)
CUPRA Born, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 16.0–15.0; CO₂ emissions in g/km: 0; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 09.2021)
Q4 Sportback e-tron, power consumption (NEDC) in kWh/100 km: combined1) 17.9–15.6; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined1) 0; efficiency class: A+. Vehicle images show special equipment. (Status: 09.2021)
ŠKODA ENYAQ iV 80x, Power consumption in kWh/100 km: 16.1 combined; CO2-emission combined in g/km: 0; Efficiency class: A+. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 09.2021)
ID.4 GTX, Power consumption in kWh/100 km: 18.2-16.3 combined; CO2-emission combined in g/km: 0; Efficiency class: A+++. Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 10.2021)
ID.5 GTX, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 17.1 – 15.6; CO₂ emissions combined in g/km: 0. Efficiency class: A+++; Vehicle image shows optional equipment.
ID.5 Pro and ID.5 Pro Performance, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 15,9 – 14,6; CO₂ emissions combined in g/km: 0; Efficiency class: A+; Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 06.2022)
CUPRA Formentor 2.0 TDI, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 5.1-4.3; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 135-113; efficiency class: B-A.Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2022)
Audi S8 TFSI, fuel consumption in l/100 km: combined 10.8-10.7; CO₂ emissions in g/km: combined 246-245; efficiency class: E.¹⁾ Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 05.2022)
ID.3 1ST, power consumption in kWh/100 km: combined 15,4 – 13,5; CO₂ emissions combined in g/km: 0; Efficiency class: A+; Vehicle image shows optional equipment. (Status: 09.2021)
ŠKODA ENYAQ iV 80 , electricity consumption in kWh/100 km: Combined 13.6; CO2 emissions in g/km: 0; efficiency class: A+++. Vehicle image shows special equipment. (Status: 02.2022)
Golf GTI, (180 kW / 245 PS) (NEDC) fuel consumption in l/100 km: urban 9.0-8.6 / extra-urban 5.6-5.3 / combined 6.9-6.5; CO₂ emissions in g/km (combined): 157-149; efficiency class: D-C. Vehicle image shows special equipment. (Status: 05.2021)